<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Soma Fountain, by Dave Jones &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog</link>
	<description>Research in New Media, Games, and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>@PW: Social Media Theory Presentation</title>
		<link>http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/2009/12/01/pw-social-media-theory-presentation/</link>
		<comments>http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/2009/12/01/pw-social-media-theory-presentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activity Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter sucks; Tweetdeck is Better
View more presentations from DaveLJones.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="__ss_2625365" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;"><a style="font:14px Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif;display:block;margin:12px 0 3px 0;text-decoration:underline;" title="Twitter sucks; Tweetdeck is Better" href="http://www.slideshare.net/DaveLJones/twitter-sucks-tweetdeck-is-better">Twitter sucks; Tweetdeck is Better</a><object style="margin:0px" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=twitterapps-091201124531-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=twitter-sucks-tweetdeck-is-better" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="margin:0px" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=twitterapps-091201124531-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=twitter-sucks-tweetdeck-is-better" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;">View more <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/DaveLJones">DaveLJones</a>.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/2009/12/01/pw-social-media-theory-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Twitter sucks; Tweetdeck is better”: Assessing Third-Party Clients for Users of Social Media</title>
		<link>http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/2009/10/25/%e2%80%9ctwitter-sucks-tweetdeck-is-better%e2%80%9d-assessing-third-party-clients-for-users-of-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/2009/10/25/%e2%80%9ctwitter-sucks-tweetdeck-is-better%e2%80%9d-assessing-third-party-clients-for-users-of-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activity Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is my proposal for Social Media Theory. Yeah&#8230; I can really pull this off&#8230;  
Research on Twitter has exploded over the last year as the social networking service (SNS) has become increasingly popular. Since its inception, the service has proven a remarkably agile tool, especially when networked with other SNS sites. Connecting different [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Below is my proposal for Social Media Theory. Yeah&#8230; I can really pull this off&#8230; <img src='http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </em></p>
<p>Research on Twitter has exploded over the last year as the social networking service (SNS) has become increasingly popular. Since its inception, the service has proven a remarkably agile tool, especially when networked with other SNS sites. Connecting different SNS sites <em>ad hoc </em>has allowed Twitter to thrive as a communication channel. Relying on previous work that establishes the need for adaptable and articulated connections among different social media (Potts, 2009), this paper extends such work by examining the rather different user interfaces (UI) of two third party Twitter applications, Tweetdeck and Twhirl, in light of Activity Theory (AT) and the concept of <em>affordances</em>. Borrowing from the synthesis of AT and <em>affordances</em> offered by Baerentsen and Trettvik (2002), I argue that when combined with third-party clients, Twitter facilitates communication channels as articulated activities. Instead of fostering either synchronous (like IRC) or asynchronous networks (like blogs and message boards), these streams become persistent (McNely, 2009).</p>
<p>From this basis, I will argue that third-party clients more effectively exploit Twitter’s affordances by making the streams, and thus the user’s experience, modular and emergent. They allow real-time modularity in content by facilitating the near-instantaneous exchange of both written and visual information, as well as quick linking to secondary sources of information. By comparing the UIs of Tweetdeck and Twhirl, along with that of Twitter’s own web-based UI, we can assess the how these clients allow the user to adapt Twitter streams to their own communication needs and praxis. The flexibility given to users via such clients serves as a tremendous signpost to the nature of and need for modular experiences in communication channels as information content evolves. Not only do the social networks themselves need to be articulated and modular, but so do the UIs through which users engage with these networks.</p>
<p>References.</p>
<p>Baerentsenj K.B. and Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. Published in the Association of Computing Machinery’s <em>Proceedings of NordiCHI</em>, Arhus, Denmark, pp. 51-60.</p>
<p>McNely, B.J. (2009). Bachchannel persistence and collaborative meaning-making. Published in the Association of Computing Machinery’s <em>Proceedings of SIGDOC ’09</em>, Bloomington, IN, pp. 297-303.</p>
<p>Potts, L. Using actor network theory to trace and improve multimodal communication design. <em>Technical Communication Quarterly</em> 18(3), pp. 281-301.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djone111.grads.digitalodu.com/blog/2009/10/25/%e2%80%9ctwitter-sucks-tweetdeck-is-better%e2%80%9d-assessing-third-party-clients-for-users-of-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
